| Window | Dates | Days |
|---|---|---|
| Window 1 | 01 NOV – 15 DEC 2026 | 45d |
| Window 2 | 01 NOV 2026 – 10 JAN 2027 | 71d |
As publishedNorth Zone (above I-74): Nov. 1 – Dec. 15, 2026; South Zone (below I-74): Nov. 1, 2026 – Jan. 10, 2027
Zoned at I-74: North Zone daily bag 4, South Zone daily bag 8 (possession 2x daily bag in both zones). Bag limits vary on some individual DNR Fish & Wildlife Areas; see full Hunting & Trapping Guide. Requires valid hunting license plus Indiana Gamebird Habitat Stamp. HIP not required (resident upland game).
IDNR's own bobwhite species page states plainly that southeastern and southwestern Indiana provide the best Northern bobwhite populations in the state, naming Greene, Daviess, Knox, and Sullivan counties (southwestern Indiana) as historically holding better habitat and bird numbers, while explicitly ruling out two other regions as poor habitat: south-central Indiana, too heavily wooded, and central Indiana, too intensely farmed, with the northern third of the state always marginal range due to harsh winters and snow accumulation. This population range is legally reflected in a hard regulatory zone: Indiana's bobwhite season is split at Interstate 74, and a 2014 DNR roadside whistle count found steeper declines in the North Zone (-52%) than the South Zone (-30%) that year, consistent with the south holding the stronger population. This is a case where the state's own habitat-investment program does not match the population range: IDNR's 33 Gamebird Habitat Areas managed for quail (along with pheasant and dove) are concentrated entirely in five northwest Indiana counties (Benton, Newton, Jasper, Warren, White), outside both of the species' own named strongholds, worth flagging explicitly so a reader doesn't conflate the state's habitat-program footprint with where the wild population is actually strongest.
Indiana's bobwhite population is reported as stable heading into 2026, per Pointing Dog Journal's annual cross-state hunting forecast. IDNR runs a real, county-level spring whistle-count survey, but it isn't independently published; this aggregator is the only public channel for it. Unlike the 2025 edition, which named specific counties (Pulaski, Vigo, Daviess) with numeric detail, this year's mention carries no county-level data, a general read rather than a precise one, but nothing points to a notably better or worse year than usual.
No specific driver given behind the 'stable' read — a general population statement, not tied to a named survey figure or weather event.
Join the waitlist and tell us what you’re working on — the planner reads it first once your access opens.
Free, invite-gated, unsubscribe anytime. See what it returns